press → to begin

Contents

  • 1 The July Drawdown
  • 2 Q2 Earnings
  • 3 AI Capability Curve
  • 4 Drivers of AI
  • 5 The Analogy Trap
2
Q2 2026 · The July Drawdown

Three sellers. Three record quarters. Three falling prices.

Who was selling
What the company reported
What the price did
Korean retail leverage
After May's single-stock leveraged ETFs, one in thirty adults held a leveraged account that got margin-called.
SK hynix 000660
Revenue +257%
Operating income +557%
−15.4%
one session, 13 July
Institutional leverage
Situational Awareness LP, ~4× levered.
$45bn → $10bn in days.
CoreWeave CRWV
Revenue +112%
Backlog $104bn
−30%
month to 26 July
Narrative shock
1 July: Meta to resell surplus compute.
MS Momentum TMT −53.5%.
Bloom Energy BE
Revenue +166%
Product revenue +215%
−32%
across July
1
Q2 2026 · Q2 Earnings

Four sentences from the quarter

"Even at that amount, we will still not have enough capacity to meet all the demand we have in 2026… In fact, the demand we already have for 2028 is striking."
Andy Jassy, CEO, Amazon — while raising 2026 capex from $200bn to $220bn. AWS backlog: $496bn.
"We're able to deploy capital in such a way that we're getting less than a one-year payback. It's almost like your capital is becoming an item you would otherwise put in COGS, because it's moving so quickly into revenue."
Bret Johnsen, CFO, SpaceX — while Ed Zitron calls the private credit funding these builds "the subprime mortgage crisis of the AI bubble."
"We recently signed an A100 contract that extends into 2029 at an attractive price. As a reminder, this SKU was introduced in 2020."
CoreWeave, Q2 call — while Burry calls writing off AI chips over five to six years "one of the more common frauds of the modern era."
"SpaceX expects to buy more than five gigawatts of Nvidia's Vera Rubin architecture next year — over $200 billion. Nvidia's entire revenue last year was $216 billion."
Jukka Lepikkö on X
3
Q2 2026 · AI Capability Curve

AI builds AI — faster every cycle

The software
Code shipped per Anthropic engineer
0.9×
Q4
2023
1.0×
Q1
2024
0.9×
Q2
0.9×
Q3
1.0×
Q4
1.2×
Q1
2025
1.5×
Q2
1.9×
Q3
2.5×
Q4
5.8×
Q1
2026
8.0×
Q2
2026
Anthropic Institute — multiple of pre-2025 avg
The iron
Autonomous chip verification, weeks to hours
WAS
weeks
NOW
hours
40×
faster verification cycles
Cadence "ChipStack" super-agent. NVIDIA's first customer is itself — verifying its own next-gen chips.
Jensen Huang, GTC Taipei 2026
"We are not there yet, and recursive self-improvement is not inevitable. But it could come sooner than most institutions are prepared for."
Q2 2026 · AI Capability Curve

Capabilities evolve faster

METR Task Complexity Timeline

Task length at 80% success rate · model release date

METR task complexity timeline
Source: METR (metr.org) · CC-BY · doubling time 196 days · R² 0.98

Key Models in 2025–26

Projected capability frontier by model

Key models 2025-26 capability frontier
Asilo Insight: Doubling time: 7 months → accelerating to ~4 months
7
space / → to advance · V to replay · M to mute
click the slide or press M for sound
Q2 2026 · AI Capability Curve

Improvement in quality means capability unlock

Key Models in 2025–26

Projected capability frontier by model

Capability frontier
BEFORE
Onefile at a time
JS???
Debug syntax errors
Test & retest
Search documentation
Hours per feature
Brain overload ↓
NOW — EFFICIENCY
OUTPUT
Fourfiles at once
JSJSHTMLJSON
✓ Almost always works
DOWNLOADS FROM CLAUDE
Server v19JS
Metrics calculator v2JS
Index v9HTML
Position history v2JSON
DEPLOY
scp server_v19.js server:
scp metrics_v2.js server:
scp index_v9.html server:
scp position.json server:
ssh systemctl restart
✓ Live in seconds
8
One threshold, six trajectories · V to replay
Q2 2026 · Drivers of AI

Drivers of AI

1
Jevon's Paradox
Lower costs → higher total spending
Revenue Cost/unit
25 years of semiconductors:
100× cheaper → 3× more revenue
2
AI Speed Revolution
400× faster than Moore's Law
Moore's
2.8x
AI Progress
1200x
3 years of AI:
1200× cheaper tokens
3
Scaling Laws Hold
More compute = better performance
o1 o3 Compute →
AIME scores: 27% → 90%
No plateau in sight
4
Token Explosion
Scale differenceFrom single prompts to continuous reasoning loops
Multi-step processingIterate, reflect, and refine outputs
AgentsAutonomous systems on complex tasks
Token Explosion: millions of tokens per conversation
9
Q2 2026 · The Analogy Trap

Familiar shape. Wrong limits.

When forecasting AI we instinctively borrow the shape of past growth — and quietly import its limits. They don't apply here.
The borrowed model
Substitution into a fixed pool
better ROI per ad €
LINEAR TVFACEBOOK
Ad dollars moved from TV to Facebook because the unit economics were better. Growth was bounded by the size of the existing ad market — a finite, known pool.
Familiar shape. Built-in ceiling.
Why this wave breaks the model
Four forces, no ceiling
01
New use cases emerge
Capability is multidimensional. Each new threshold unlocks tasks that did not exist before.
Breaks: "the total market is fixed"
02
Jevons paradox at speed
Tokens 1,200× cheaper than 3 years ago. Total spend rises, not falls.
Breaks: "cheaper unit → lower revenue"
03
Scaling laws hold
More compute → predictably better models. No plateau in sight.
Breaks: "technology eventually plateaus"
04
Token explosion
Prompts → reasoning loops → agents. Per-task usage explodes by orders of magnitude.
Breaks: "per-task usage is stable"
10
AsiloARGO · Q2 2026
1 / 11
→ / space next build or slide
back
↓ / ↑ skip whole slide
1–9 jump to slide
V replay video
N speaker notes
F fullscreen
Esc close this